Steel Tubing Tariffs Prove that NAFTA Still Needs Work

The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA)farther away from free trade. Dumping and
was implemented on January 1, 1994. Antariffs are both activities that will keep the
extension of the previous Canada-U.S. Free Tradecountries away from free trade.The greatest
Agreement of 1989, NAFTA is the second largestcontroversy is that trade has not really become
free trade area in the world. The agreementmore fair at all with NAFTA but has even possibly
intends to limit restrictions on trade in manybecome more unfair. For instance, it is being
industries and phase out tariffs in a period of 14argued that while trying to stimulate and protect
years. While NAFTA has created greater trade intrade in North America, NAFTA is inhibiting trade
North America, there still are concerns on howwith other countries such as China. Another
well the trade agreement is accomplishing its goalproblem is it looks as if growth is occurring only in
of deregulation. These concerns gained somethe northern states of Mexico with little effect in
validity with the recent issuance of tariffs in thethe southern states. The trade agreement has
steel tubing market in Mexico.After a carefulbeen blamed for the increased concentration of
investigation, Mexico's Economy of Ministry camewealth in the United States and Mexico in the last
to the conclusion that the United States wasten years.
dumping their steel tubing productsWhile Mexico's overall economy has picked up
into their country. The term "dumping" is used tosince NAFTA, it appears that the richer are
denote any product that is sold to anothergetting richer while the poor are getting poorer.
country for a lower price than in its home market.The workers in Mexico have experienced a 20%
By many, dumping is believed to be unfairdecrease in pay since the implementation of
competition. With the 469% increase in U.S. steelNAFTA. It seems that NAFTA is helping out
tubing imports from 1999 and 2001(reported bycorporations without helping the people.As seen
Mexico's Economy of Ministry) it appears thatfrom the recent steel tubing example, NAFTA still
there was some definite foul play occurring in thehas a lot of room for improvement. We need to
industry. Mexico's Economy of Ministry felt thatbe aware of the term "free trade" and know that
tariffs were needed on U.S. steel tubing in orderthis means that products cannot be dumped to
to stop the effects of dumping and to help theother countries like steel tubing to Mexico.
economy in Mexico.On May 27, 2005 MexicoBecause of this dumping, the country has to
issued tariffs that will raise prices of U.S. tubingcompensate with tariffs and this brings us even
anywhere from 7 percent to 25 percent in hopesfarther away from free trade. While the intention
of leveling out the playing field in the steelof NAFTA to stimulate the North American
industry. A statement made by the Ministryeconomy is a good cause, it has to be done in
declared that "imports from the United Statesthe right way. We cannot sacrifice the people's
take place under conditions of price discriminationwell being for the sake of the economy. Revisions
andto NAFTA need to be created to ensure that
harm national production of similar products." Thisfree trade will exist between the countries.Kaitlin
event has proven that NAFTA has not cured allCarruth is a client account specialist with 10x
our problems with trade and is still struggling inMarketing - More Visitors. More Buyers. More
deregulation. In result of trying to save jobs in theRevenue.
steel industry, both countries have brought us